Marble Technologies Inc V City Of Hampton
Mallon brought to you by free law project.
Marble technologies inc v city of hampton. 010 6 036 marble technologies inc. According to the plaintiffs the developable area of their parcels was not included in an rpa or its buffer area prior to the 2008 amendment to the city zoning ordinance. February 25 2010. 409 417 690 s e 2d 84 88 2010 internal quotation marks omitted.
And shri ganesh llc collectively the plaintiffs own two separate parcels of land located in the grand view section of the city. From the circuit court of the city of hampton. City of lodi 145 p 2d 574. 090043 justice cynthia d.
From the circuit court of the city of hampton louis r. Wilford taylor jr judge. Therefore by nature enabling acts are permissive. Opinion for marble technologies v.
Marble technologies inc et al. City of hampton 690 s e 2d 84 brought to you by free law project a non profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. The company s line of business includes providing business consulting services on a contract or fee basis. City of hampton 279 va.
From the circuit court of the city of hampton. Marble technologies inc et al. June 04 2015 present. In this appeal we consider whether an express easement created by a 1936 deed was stationary or moved with the changing mean high water line.
Marble technologies inc was founded in 2000. Marble technologies inc et al. This appeal involves the chesapeake bay preservation act code 10 1 2100 through 2115 the act and its implementing. City of hampton comments off on 010 6 036 marble technologies inc.
Promotional products with well over 1 000 promotional products we are the leader in north america when it comes to promotional rubber stamps marking products ping pong beer pong and custom table products. Hampton is a collection of unique divisions driven by common leadership. Lerner judge in this appeal we consider whether an express easement created by a 1936 deed was stationary or moved with the changing mean high water line. City of hampton et al.
June 4 2015. See e g shealor v. Opinion for marble technologies inc.